Skip to main content

Change Ain't Bad


Okay. So, like, as people, we rail against change. I realize not everyone's the same in this regard and that it's entirely situational (if my life was about to change by way of inheriting a ton of money from some distant so-and-so, I'd be so ready) but no one's ready for the death of a loved one, for their car to break down, finally, forever, to be suddenly faced with having to sell their most precious belongings just to stay alive, etc.

But change happens. Life goes on, time persists in whatever bizarre and cosmic way it does, matter moves, and people keep people-ing. In Nicholas Carr's Atlantic article "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" he addresses personal issues with The Google Machine, and bemoans a newly developed lack of attention and deep-reading ability and a general change in the way that he and other outspoken Gen-X technophobes operate on a cognitive and neurological level. But, okay, so we maybe we can't make a habit out of six-hour sessions of  A Tale of Two Cities. I think I'll get over it.

The idea that our thought patterns are shifting as a species is probably mostly true. And I hope so: a new pattern of thought might be what our planet needs. With the outbreak of the smartphone epidemic in 2010, the right-on-our-heels Google Fiber, and even interplanetary colonization, we're on the cusp of ultimate human togetherness. Our work has become ubiquitously collaborative, and it can be, on a global level. We can instantaneously cooperate to write songs or stories, create and operate a business, or start and carry out a disaster relief effort with anyone in the entire world. This allows for some incredible things. Websites like AllExperts.com, Wikipedia.org, or the Tree of Life Web Project represent communities of professionals and experts all over the world, giving the planetary public near-instant access to coveted information about anything you could want to know ever. Imagine Gregor Mendel, who gave us the modern idea of genetic inheritance, and Carl Nägeli a Swiss botanist that discouraged Mendel's ideas, communicating by email or via Twitter instead of handwritten letters sent by a mail system contemporary to the Pony Express.


And maybe the rapidity with which Nägeli could reply would have been irreparably off-putting to Mendel. But the LEGIONS of other prominent scientists using Twitter would have been able to see Mendel's enthusiastic Tweet and join in the conversation, allowing for quick and productive peer-review.

This emphasis on communication and collaboration reminds me of a video I watched during the academic cold-spell of winter break. It addresses the idea that nothing is entirely our own, and that creation is really just recreation, and that nothing can ever be made without a group of contributors.
  


So don't rage against the machine. Bask in that shit. We're moving into an age of unity through technology. Hop aboard the proverbial express train to human cooperation and collaborative innovation. It's gonna be a good ride.

Comments

  1. I hate you for being flawless.

    But I hate out of love.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's really nice in a roundabout way. So thank you!

      Delete
    2. Your welcome. . 3 . <3 /justacceptmyhatelove

      Delete
  2. I really like your writing style! It is casual, but thought provoking and very memorable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It means a lot to me for you to have said this. Thank you.

      Delete
  3. I've always really enjoyed the idea that nothing is truly original or inherently our own idea. It brings into discussion the thought of a shared human consciousness extending back before the internet or even the modern era in general.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Extended Human

Says Marshall McLuhan: "All media are extensions of some human faculty– psychic or physical." With this, the co-creator of 1967's experimental book on the philosophy of communication, The Medium is the Massage , provides some interesting food for thought. On the following two pages he makes claims about objects and the human body parts from which they extend. The wheel from the foot, the book from the eye, clothing from the skin. And this is a pretty compelling concept: The wheel is like an exo-foot, a re-imagining of the foot that preforms nearly the same function but is many times and in many ways more efficient. Written text provides us vision of people and worlds we cannot see with our eyes alone. Clothing... well, you get the point. I could not have seen Spike Jonze's Her  at a more appropriate time. First of all: excellent film. The movie's about a guy that falls in love with a computer. But the best part is that almost no-one thinks that's ...

Here Comes Everybody

Clay Shirky, the author of Here Comes Everybody , writes, "When we change the way we communicate, we change society." This is the legend on the map. The cypher.  As I'm sitting in a library, I see form influenced by function. Book shelves are lined so that people may pass between them, scanning titles and call numbers. Each shelf has a long, rectangular space in which many books can be placed. Each book is a rectangle folded around flat, rectangular pages. The form or shape of each of these structured objects is a direct result of its function. Things are shaped the way they are because of the task they preform. Chairs must have a surface that keeps our butts off the ground, and their shape falls victim to that aspect of their function.  This opposite true of communication. The form of our communication shapes the function. For instance: a book is a medium of communication. The form of it, the pages and spine, lead to its function as shelf matter. (That's not ...