Skip to main content

The Bees

Tonight, I saw a film about bees.

Swiss film director Markus Imhoof's documentary, More Than Honey (2012), talks about the current situation of honey bees on Earth, the change in their relationship with humans over the last century, and what may be in store for their future. I don't consider myself a bug guy, but I was moved by this film.

"One-third of what we eat wouldn't exist without bees."

I have spent a lot of time loving capitalism. Because of the culture in which I was raised, it always seemed unequivocally right to me that every human should earn a salary proportionate to their work output. You work hard and you see the benefit of that hard work in the form of a satisfactory pay check. The free market seems, naturally, the correct and good economic system in which to live: if you want to start a business or offer goods to consumers, you can do that, and you're free to grow your business and increase your output and production and gain proportional profit and everybody wins because consumers get what they want or need and you get their money to make your business even better. 

And I'm sort of ashamed that it took me this long to realize, but I think I hate capitalism a little bit. Or, I guess, I hate the way that American culture applies capitalism in its economy, politics, and worldview. I do think that good, hard workers should receive pay proportional to the value of their output. I do think that humans should have to right to pursue a business venture of their choosing, and should have a right to grow their business. But when does it end? 

What I mean is, More Than Honey depicts several beekeepers and bee-product producers around the world. One of them is American company Miller Honey Farms. I was aware while watching the film that American industry and big-business were purposefully being portrayed negatively, but they just seemed rotten. It appeared that the use of bees for fruit-tree pollination on a massive scale (try 810,000-acres-of-almond-trees-and-that's-only-almond-trees massive) was taking a horrible toll on the global bee population. The bees are subjected to high-stress situations, pesticides, synthesized antibiotics, and disease as a result of bee keepers and fruit producers trying to maximize product output and decrease loss. But that's eroding the global bee population, which is also extremely harmful to humans.

So should we impose more severe limits on businesses? Should we let Walmart and Nike and Miller Honey Farms run amok until they ruin the universe? Or do these companies generate enough jobs and contribute enough to the national and global economies to make their exaggerated existences worthwhile or even necessary to progress?

Comments

  1. UnknownFebruary 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM

    I was pretty sure that there are even more problems with the bee population; that they are just dying out. Not even this. And knowing that there's some sort of unseen bee-killer trying to wipe them out AND companies screwing with them makes me wonder if anyone's going to finally do something about it. This video was made in 2012. I want to see if anything's been done about it in the past two-ish years because of this other, more natural, disaster that is happening to the bees, as well. I would certainly hope that they'd change their ways for the greater conservation of bees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownFebruary 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM

      You GOTTA watch the whole movie! There is light at the end of the tunnel. Plus, the movie's pretty to look at.

      Delete
    2. UnknownFebruary 25, 2014 at 12:15 PM

      <3 /\(o W o) )) ))> will do!

      That's a bee clapping its hands, in case you couldn't tell. //ijustreallyfuckinglovebeesokay

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Extended Human

Says Marshall McLuhan: "All media are extensions of some human faculty– psychic or physical." With this, the co-creator of 1967's experimental book on the philosophy of communication, The Medium is the Massage , provides some interesting food for thought. On the following two pages he makes claims about objects and the human body parts from which they extend. The wheel from the foot, the book from the eye, clothing from the skin. And this is a pretty compelling concept: The wheel is like an exo-foot, a re-imagining of the foot that preforms nearly the same function but is many times and in many ways more efficient. Written text provides us vision of people and worlds we cannot see with our eyes alone. Clothing... well, you get the point. I could not have seen Spike Jonze's Her  at a more appropriate time. First of all: excellent film. The movie's about a guy that falls in love with a computer. But the best part is that almost no-one thinks that's ...
1 comment
Read more

Here Comes Everybody

Clay Shirky, the author of Here Comes Everybody , writes, "When we change the way we communicate, we change society." This is the legend on the map. The cypher.  As I'm sitting in a library, I see form influenced by function. Book shelves are lined so that people may pass between them, scanning titles and call numbers. Each shelf has a long, rectangular space in which many books can be placed. Each book is a rectangle folded around flat, rectangular pages. The form or shape of each of these structured objects is a direct result of its function. Things are shaped the way they are because of the task they preform. Chairs must have a surface that keeps our butts off the ground, and their shape falls victim to that aspect of their function.  This opposite true of communication. The form of our communication shapes the function. For instance: a book is a medium of communication. The form of it, the pages and spine, lead to its function as shelf matter. (That's not ...
Post a Comment
Read more