Skip to main content

The Danger of Categories


What is it about human culture that makes us gravitate toward binaries? We thrive in the realm of ‘black or white,’ ‘male or female,’ ‘good or bad,’ ‘us or them.’ And it’s the last one, us or them that is presently causing me the most grief. Is it the fault of our language, or the fault of our thought processes as determined by nature or physiology, that leads us to rely so heavily on categorization as a means to organize and understand our perception of the world?

People love groups. We love to group things. This is this type of thing. This is that type of thing. They are this type of people. There are some pretty basic incarnations of this often limiting habit: grocery store aisles, restaurant menus, a phonebook (if anyone remembers what those are.) The danger in accepting this worldview as the norm is not its necessarily inclusion, but exclusion. By including filet mignon on only the ‘dinner’ section of a restaurant menu, we are saying “filet mignon is neither a breakfast food nor a lunch food.” But is that true about filet mignon? Are we not receiving the same amount of calories and nutrition and flavor no matter when in the day we eat filet mignon?

This is where social discrimination comes from. Despite the continuum of human skin color, we see black, white, brown, (and formerly yellow and red). If you are not one, you must be the other. If you are not young, you must be old. If you are not man, you must be woman. But the truth is complex. And it may be in complexity that the problem lies. Is it so easy to view the world categorically that we fall into the habit by way of laziness?

It’s easy to form groups. Waiting in any food service line that’s moving too slowly, doesn’t it become incomparably easy to talk to the stranger in front of or behind you? “This is ridiculous, why is it taking so long?” “I know, right?” Instantly you’re connected because you realize you’re in the same group of people; you’re all in a group of hungry people with things to do other than wait in a line. Dare I mention Team Edward and Team Jacob? It’s easy to create a social ‘other.’ It’s easy to say “I like/dislike people that are/do x.”

But people are more complex than that. We each know that about our individual selves, but find it difficult to see that in our other human companions. We organize in categories, and allow this to inform our view of things that are unable to be categorized. Like, yeah, you can say that lemons and bananas are both Yellow Fruits, but ultimately, one is a lemon, and one is a banana. They serve different functions. They are distinct and unique and individual. We must adopt a means of understanding the world that is as complex as the world we’re trying to understand.

Comments

  1. dereksayswhatMarch 4, 2014 at 8:07 AM

    This post is what i like to call inception as in it got way to deep. but its somthing that i feel people need to read. i was reminded of a quote from the show nip/tuck "labels are for cans of tuna not people" and thats something i think people need to understand. Not everything is black or white, and i struggle to be around people who feel that way. I dont understand societies need to label everything, somethings just are what they are and lets leave them be.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Extended Human

Says Marshall McLuhan: "All media are extensions of some human faculty– psychic or physical." With this, the co-creator of 1967's experimental book on the philosophy of communication, The Medium is the Massage , provides some interesting food for thought. On the following two pages he makes claims about objects and the human body parts from which they extend. The wheel from the foot, the book from the eye, clothing from the skin. And this is a pretty compelling concept: The wheel is like an exo-foot, a re-imagining of the foot that preforms nearly the same function but is many times and in many ways more efficient. Written text provides us vision of people and worlds we cannot see with our eyes alone. Clothing... well, you get the point. I could not have seen Spike Jonze's Her  at a more appropriate time. First of all: excellent film. The movie's about a guy that falls in love with a computer. But the best part is that almost no-one thinks that's ...
1 comment
Read more

Here Comes Everybody

Clay Shirky, the author of Here Comes Everybody , writes, "When we change the way we communicate, we change society." This is the legend on the map. The cypher.  As I'm sitting in a library, I see form influenced by function. Book shelves are lined so that people may pass between them, scanning titles and call numbers. Each shelf has a long, rectangular space in which many books can be placed. Each book is a rectangle folded around flat, rectangular pages. The form or shape of each of these structured objects is a direct result of its function. Things are shaped the way they are because of the task they preform. Chairs must have a surface that keeps our butts off the ground, and their shape falls victim to that aspect of their function.  This opposite true of communication. The form of our communication shapes the function. For instance: a book is a medium of communication. The form of it, the pages and spine, lead to its function as shelf matter. (That's not ...
Post a Comment
Read more