Skip to main content

Manifest Knowledge Reformation

A friend of mine recently revealed to me a bit of the wisdom by which he leads his life: "If you're the smartest person in the room," he says, as the saying goes, "you're in the wrong room." The dated phrase may be gathering dust or suffering from arthritic joint pain, but I abide it. I find that surrounding myself with brilliant people presents me with the daily challenge of keeping up, meeting their knowledge, approaching their understanding. Being in the company of smart people makes me want to be smart enough to earn their company, and that motivates me to exercise my brain often and well. 

In his book Too Big To Know (Perseus, 2011), technologist and author David Weinberger demands a recalculation of this useful maxim. The network, or the internet, he claims, is changing knowledge. By changing the way we access and interact with knowledge (relocating information from books, libraries, and our physical brains to networked webpages), the internet has changed and is changing the structure or foundation of knowledge and what it means to know. Because the internet connects information and people, any given person's individual knowledge becomes a part of the network. Connect billions of people, and our bank of knowledge is immediately, unfathomably huge. Like, fucking really big. 

What does this have to do with being the smartest person in the room? A lot. The internet has become a continuously growing room of people, and has become the largest storage-center for human knowledge ever. Ever. 

"The smartest person in the room," says Weinberger, "is the room itself[.]"

Just as we've built the room, we are the room. And just as we are the room, the room is (maybe) infinitely more intelligent than any one human or group of humans can be. This new structure or form of knowledge is exciting (and scary, because we only kind of get it). It demands that we reevaluate our notions of intellectual capability, shared knowledge, and that we adopt a new culture of knowledge; that is, we must ask ourselves how knowing our newborn community of knowing will alter our global cultural understanding of knowledge and truth and fact. (Too big to know, indeed.)

And we have no idea how much it (the internet) will change, or how big it can get, or how it will appear in its final form. So what this all means for us as a people isn't really clear. It's, at the moment, too big to know (new favorite phrase). 

Mad cool, though, right?

Comments

  1. Great post. Being in contact with smart people can be a awarding challenge.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Extended Human

Says Marshall McLuhan: "All media are extensions of some human faculty– psychic or physical." With this, the co-creator of 1967's experimental book on the philosophy of communication, The Medium is the Massage , provides some interesting food for thought. On the following two pages he makes claims about objects and the human body parts from which they extend. The wheel from the foot, the book from the eye, clothing from the skin. And this is a pretty compelling concept: The wheel is like an exo-foot, a re-imagining of the foot that preforms nearly the same function but is many times and in many ways more efficient. Written text provides us vision of people and worlds we cannot see with our eyes alone. Clothing... well, you get the point. I could not have seen Spike Jonze's Her  at a more appropriate time. First of all: excellent film. The movie's about a guy that falls in love with a computer. But the best part is that almost no-one thinks that's ...

Here Comes Everybody

Clay Shirky, the author of Here Comes Everybody , writes, "When we change the way we communicate, we change society." This is the legend on the map. The cypher.  As I'm sitting in a library, I see form influenced by function. Book shelves are lined so that people may pass between them, scanning titles and call numbers. Each shelf has a long, rectangular space in which many books can be placed. Each book is a rectangle folded around flat, rectangular pages. The form or shape of each of these structured objects is a direct result of its function. Things are shaped the way they are because of the task they preform. Chairs must have a surface that keeps our butts off the ground, and their shape falls victim to that aspect of their function.  This opposite true of communication. The form of our communication shapes the function. For instance: a book is a medium of communication. The form of it, the pages and spine, lead to its function as shelf matter. (That's not ...